The debate over retiring engineering terms like "slave" and "blacklist" has led to nearly a year of back and forth discussion at Internet Engineering Task Force (Kate Conger/New York Times)

The debate over retiring engineering terms like "slave" and "blacklist" has led to nearly a year of back and forth discussion at Internet Engineering Task Force (Kate Conger/New York Times)

The debate over retiring engineering terms like "slave" and "blacklist" has led to nearly a year of back and forth discussion at Internet Engineering Task Force (Kate Conger/New York Times)

The debate over retiring engineering terms like "slave" and "blacklist" has led to nearly a year of back and forth discussion at Internet Engineering Task Force (Kate Conger/New York Times) https://ift.tt/2RtA7Nn

Kate Conger / New York Times:
The debate over retiring engineering terms like “slave” and “blacklist” has led to nearly a year of back and forth discussion at Internet Engineering Task Force  —  Nearly a year after the Internet Engineering Task Force took up a plan to replace words that could be considered racist, the debate is still raging.


Related Posts

0 Response to "The debate over retiring engineering terms like "slave" and "blacklist" has led to nearly a year of back and forth discussion at Internet Engineering Task Force (Kate Conger/New York Times)"

Post a Comment

THANK YOU

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel