Analysis of 1,800 AI datasets: ~70% didn't state what license should be used or had been mislabeled with more permissive guidelines than their creators intended (Nitasha Tiku/Washington Post)
Analysis of 1,800 AI datasets: ~70% didn't state what license should be used or had been mislabeled with more permissive guidelines than their creators intended (Nitasha Tiku/Washington Post) https://bit.ly/3QaBnzK
Analysis of 1,800 AI datasets: ~70% didn't state what license should be used or had been mislabeled with more permissive guidelines than their creators intended — The Data Provenance Initiative analyzed data sets used to build generative AI and found confusion surrounding licencing and fair use.
0 Response to "Analysis of 1,800 AI datasets: ~70% didn't state what license should be used or had been mislabeled with more permissive guidelines than their creators intended (Nitasha Tiku/Washington Post)"
Post a Comment
THANK YOU