How "made for advertising" sites, which are criticized for their UX and dubious results for advertisers, get ~15% of automated ad spend or $10B/year, per ANA (Megan Graham/Wall Street Journal)
How "made for advertising" sites, which are criticized for their UX and dubious results for advertisers, get ~15% of automated ad spend or $10B/year, per ANA (Megan Graham/Wall Street Journal) https://bit.ly/3sBmfhf
How “made for advertising” sites, which are criticized for their UX and dubious results for advertisers, get ~15% of automated ad spend or $10B/year, per ANA — Industry leaders want brands to shun ‘MFA’ websites. Others think more nuance is needed.
0 Response to "How "made for advertising" sites, which are criticized for their UX and dubious results for advertisers, get ~15% of automated ad spend or $10B/year, per ANA (Megan Graham/Wall Street Journal)"
Post a Comment
THANK YOU